RainBowSpear

Translate

26 May 2011

new bill relaxes laws on the deforestation of hilltops and the amount of vegetation farmers must preserve.

Brazil has taken a big step towards passing new laws that will loosen restrictions on the amount of Amazon rainforest that farmers can destroy, after its lower house of parliament voted in favour of updating the country's 46-year-old forest code.

In a move described as "disastrous" by conservationists, the nation's congress backed a bill relaxing laws on the deforestation of hilltops and the amount of vegetation farmers must preserve. The law also offers partial amnesties for fines levied against landowners who have illegally destroyed tracts of rainforest. The legislation, which must still be passed by the Brazillian Senate and approved by President Dilma Rousseff, aims to help owners of smaller farms and ranches compete with under-regulated rivals in countries such as the USA and Argentina.

At present, under Brazil's forest code passed in 1965, 80 per cent of all property in the Amazon basin is supposed to be left as untouched forest. In other parts of the country, that figure ranges from between 20 and 35 per cent, depending on the ecosystem of the particular region.

Farmers found to have breached the regulations have until now been required to pay large fines and plant sufficient trees to bring their landholdings up to required standards. But the system is scrappily enforced and only 10 per cent of landowners are currently believed to be in complete compliance with the rules.

Under the new code, forest that was illegally cleared between 1965 and 2008 will be exempted from regulation. In addition, farmers will, for the first time, be allowed to count land along rivers and lakes as part of their legal preserves. And strict rules governing deforestation of hilltops and slopes will be relaxed.

"It's a disaster. It heightens the risk of deforestation, water depletion and erosion," Paulo Gustavo Prado, head of environmental policy at Conservation International-Brazil, told Reuters. He believes that the new bill will result in the loss of roughly 10 per cent of Brazil's remaining rainforest.

Philip Fearnside, of the government's National Institute for Amazon Research, told the Associated Press that the "amnesty" for farmers who broke the law before 2008 will result in further illegal deforestation.

"The proposed amnesty upholds a long tradition in Brazil of legalising the illegal. People believe they can deforest illegally because sooner or later all will be forgiven."

Supporters of the bill, who have been heavily lobbied by farming groups, say the old forest code was impossible to enforce, and argue that the more relaxed laws will help them achieve better compliance.

They also decided to veto the clause in the new forest code most feared by conservationists, which would have completely removed all limits on preserving trees for small farmers and ranchers.

About 20 per cent of Brazil's rainforest has already been destroyed, and the battle to preserve the remainder arouses heated debate. Yesterday, it emerged that a green activist, José Cláudio Ribeiro da Silva, had been shot and killed in the jungle state of Para in northern Brazil. He recently predicted that he would be murdered for criticising deforestation by local ranchers.

A watchdog group, which protects activists and small farmers in the region, said yesterday that the gunmen had cut off Mr Silva's ear, probably so that they could prove to the people who hired them that they had carried out the hit.

 

24 May 2011

157,000 tickets for the Chelsea Flower Show, which opens today, sold out in record time this year.

The show gardens are utter falsities. They pretend they've long been there, instead of having been knocked up in days. They pretend to be elsewhere than they are - Australia, Malaysia, Monaco, Wales, not on Royal Hospital Road. They are plays and installations, not gardens at all, strictly speaking.

That's true even of the more naturalistic show gardens but plenty this year are outright fairground attractions, even rides. In Diarmuid Gavin's Irish Sky Garden, a potty pink gondola, turfed over both above and below, plus its passengers, is being cranked up and down by a graceless crane, allegedly having been inspired by the floating islands of the movie Avatar. In the B&Q Garden, a cramped stainless steel staircase that belongs to an in-store, multi-storey car park is planted up with basil, peppers and tomatoes, plus some gaudy calendulas, "to encourage individuals and communities to develop new local and sustainable food growing spaces".

"A Monaco Garden" proves to be a luxuriously appointed swimming pool with sun-loungers. ("I listen to money singing," Philip Larkin wrote: "It is intensely sad.") Even those gardens with appealingly practical planting (increasingly adapted to dry conditions this year, with lots of valerian, alliums, verbascums, acanthus and tulbaghias) must boast whopping great columns too, or a shed lavishly adapted from a shipping container. Rills of water bubble up everywhere, inexplicably.

Of course, the heart of Chelsea is not these outrageous concoctions but the fantastic stands of specialist growers gathered together in the Great Pavilion. Here they all are - clematis, hyacinths, lupins, heucheras, daffodils, tulips, foxgloves, lilies, lavenders, hostas, orchids - astoundingly displayed, many of them exquisite, others that could only be loved by single species obsessives, not to say paraphiliacs.

The old favourites, Peter Beales and David Austin for roses, Avon and Broadleigh for bulbs, have glorious displays. But even here, beautifully presented, in total perfection, are varieties that would otherwise never come together in time or space.

These stands are wholly artificial. These are roses that have never known a drop of rain, bulbs that have been held back and forced on with the greatest expertise, to bring spring back, as never in nature. In its own way, it's just as baroque - you might even say surreal -a display.

But then, though it may be for gardeners, a garden is the one thing the Chelsea Flower Show is not. It's a fair; for all the royal patronage and the mighty sponsors just a grander version of the fairs that have been held for centuries. As such, it  can only be embraced and revelled in.

In his great poem Show Saturday, Philip Larkin lovingly detailed the humdrum events of an ordinary agricultural show as something people share, "That breaks ancestrally each year into/ Regenerate union. Let it always be there." Chelsea too. Cranky gondolas and all.

 

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...